In this episode of COL Drag Race ‘T-Time’, Gary and Damon celebrate not only the grand finale of Season 15, but also a major milestone for the show! With the Top 4 queens going head to head to head to head (how’s your head?), listen as the guys share their thoughts when all the queens reunite and we crown a winner baby!!
In this episode of Cubs Out Loud, the guys return to a previous topic. It’s been almost five years since they produced episodes on Consent and Respect. So here in 2022, a number of years later, it’s time to revisit this important conversation. Since the COVID-19 pandemic, it seems that people are living their most bold lives when it comes to opinions and actions. The US political landscape is looking divisive between the majority conservative and progressive parties. How much do the cubs think the practice of recognizing and giving consent plays a factor outside of kink and sexual activities? Have any of their thoughts changed in the years since the previous debate?
Show Topic
Consent in 2022
Con·sent /kənˈsent/
Noun
noun: consent; plural noun: consents
permission for something to happen or agreement to do something.
Verb
verb: consent; 3rd person present: consents; past tense: consented; past participle: consented; gerund or present participle: consenting
In this episode of Cubs Out Loud, it’s another All T, No Shade show. For this episode, the guys debate regarding the recent news regarding Disney and its original silence then missteps regarding the “Don’t Say Gay” Bill in Florida, due to be signed into law in July 2022. As a beloved international corporation, what happens when it steps into a pile of political crap? Can and should the LGBTQ+ community continue to support their business when they once again reveal they are not as supportive back? Can the House of Mouse fix their LGBTQ+ problem? The cubs share their thoughts and opinions on this and more in this heated discussion.
Show Topic
ATNS: The Disney Conundrum
The challenge of when an international corporation with multiple loved IPs steps into a pile of political crap. Can the House of Mouse fix their LGBTQ+ problem? Can we support the land where dreams come true when villains threaten to destroy the world we live actually in?
In this episode of Cubs Out Loud, remember SESTA-FOSTA from 2018? Well, learn more about their newest family member EARN IT in this informative talkback. Listen in as the cubs share their opinions on the next “problem solving” legislation to combat the exploitation of those special victims. Is it really helpful or is it more harmful?
Show Topic
Remember FOSTA-SESTA? Meet their newborn cousin, EARN IT Act 2022
The Supreme Court has long recognized that the Constitution forbids laws having the collateral effect of disproportionately censoring legal speech.3 By allowing states to lower the standards for liability even further than SESTA/FOSTA, the amended EARN IT Act would create just such an impermissible collateral effect and presents even graver risks to online expression than SESTA/FOSTA, especially for the LGBTQ and sex worker communities.
As we said in our previous letter, the aftermath of the passage of SESTA/FOSTA,4 which eliminated Section 230’s liability shield for content related to sex trafficking, makes the overbroad implications for online speech clear.5 Even if the speech covered by the law could be restricted without raising constitutional concern, the content moderation practices the companies will deploy to avoid liability risk will sweep far more broadly than the illegal content.6 SESTA/FOSTA was intended to protect people engaged in sex work from being trafficked against their will. It has, instead, sent them back out into the streets and made them less safe.7 Moreover, the platforms’ content moderation practices have disproportionately silenced the LGBTQ community, making it more difficult for them to come together and create community online.8 Under the amended EARN IT Act, Section 230’s shield for all state criminal and civil aws “regarding the advertising, promotion, presentation, distribution, or solicitation” of CSAM, as that term is defined by federal law, would be eliminated, permitting states to assign liability for negligence or recklessness. In other words, states would be able to go even further than SESTA/FOSTA in lowering the standards for liability for platforms.
Eliminating Abusive and Rampant Neglect of Interactive Technologies Act of 2022 or the EARN IT Act of 2022
This bill revises the federal framework governing the prevention of online sexual exploitation of children.
The bill establishes the National Commission on Online Child Sexual Exploitation Prevention. The commission must develop best practices for interactive computer services providers (e.g., Facebook and Twitter) to prevent, reduce, and respond to the online sexual exploitation of children.
Additionally, the bill limits the liability protections of interactive computer service providers with respect to claims alleging violations of child sexual exploitation laws.
The bill replaces various statutory references to child pornography and material that contains child pornography with child sexual abuse material.
Finally, the bill makes changes to the reporting requirements for electronic communication service providers and remote computing service providers (providers) who report apparent instances of crimes involving the sexual exploitation of children to the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children. Among the changes, the bill requires providers to report facts and circumstances sufficient to identify and locate each minor and each involved individual. The bill also increases the amount of time that providers must preserve the contents of a report.
Looking to the past as prelude to the future, the only time that Congress has limited Section 230 protections was in the Allow States and Victims to Fight Online Sex Trafficking Act of 2017 (SESTA/FOSTA). That law purported to protect victims of sex trafficking by eliminating providers’ section 230 liability shield for “facilitating” sex trafficking by users. According to a 2021 study by the US Government Accountability Office, however, the law has been rarely used to combat sex trafficking. 9Instead, it has forced sex workers, whether voluntarily engaging in sex work or forced into sex trafficking against their will, offline and into harm’s way.10 It has also chilled their online expression generally, including the sharing of health and safety information, and speech wholly unrelated to sex work.11 Moreover, these burdens fell most heavily on smaller platforms that either served as allies and created spaces for the LGBTQ and sex worker communities or simply could not withstand the legal risks and compliance costs of SESTA/FOSTA.12 Congress risks repeating this mistake by rushing to pass this misguided legislation, which also limits Section 230 protections.
9Government Accountability Office. (2021). Sex Trafficking: Online Platforms and Federal prosecutions. (GAO Publication No. 21-385), (reporting that the Department of Justice had brought just one case under FOSTA, which at the time of the Report remained in court with no restitution sought, and that only one individual had pursued civil damages, in a case that was dismissed).
The EARN IT Act Jeopardizes the Security of Our Communications
The EARN IT Act Risks Undermining Child Abuse Prosecutions
The EARN IT Act would have devastating consequences for everyone’s ability to share and access information online, and to do so in a secure manner. We urge you to oppose this bill. Congress should instead consider more tailored approaches to deal with the real harms of CSAM online.
In this episode of Cubs Out Loud, the guys present their next installment of the “What is…” series. This time around, the cubs want a little R-E-S-P-E-C-T!! Listen in as the guys give the lowdown on respect. Are we being respectful to ourselves and others? Where do respect and consent align? All these questions and more are answered.
Show Topic
What is. . . Respect?
Discussion of what ‘Respect’ can be for ourselves and each other.